Expert evidence and scientific proof in criminal trials edited by Paul Roberts, University of Nottingham, UK and University of New South Wales, Australia.

Contributor(s):

Roberts, Paul, 1968- [editor.]

Material type: Text

TextSeries: The international library of essays on criminal lawPublication details: England : Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2014.Description: lviii, 605 pages ; 26 cmISBN:

9781409466062

Subject(s):

DDC classification:

345.42067 ROB.E

Online resources:

Table of contents only

Summary: Contents Machine generated contents note: pt. I INTERDISCIPLINARY `FORENSIC SCIENCE' THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS 1.`Historical and Practical Considerations Regarding Expert Testimony', Harvard Law Review, 15, pp. 40 58 / Learned Hand 2.`A Just Measure of Science', in Michael Freeman and Helen Reece (eds), Science in Court, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 11 36 / David Nelken 3.`Science and Technology Studies on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise', Social Studies of Science, 35, pp. 269 311 / Simon Cole 4.`Of Truth, in Science and in Law', Brooklyn Law Review, 73, pp. 985 1008 / Susan Haack 5.`The Irrelevance, and Central Relevance, of the Boundary between Science and Non-Science in the Evaluation of Expert Witness Reliability', Villanova Law Review, 52, pp. 679 722 / D. Michael Risinger pt. II EXPERT EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 6.`Fingerprint Evidence in an Age of DNA Profiling', Brooklyn Law Review, 67, pp. 14 71 / Jennifer L. Mnookin Contents note continued: 7.`Science in the Criminal Process', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14, pp. 469 506 / Paul Roberts 8.`"Junk Science": The Criminal Cases', Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, pp. 105 28 / Paul C. Giannelli 9.`Sounding Out Expert Voice Identification', Criminal Law Review, pp. 771 90 / David Ormerod 10.`Atkins v The Emperor. The "Cautious" Use of Unreliable "Expert" Opinion', International Journal of Evidence & Proof 14, pp. 146 66 / Mehera San Roque 11.`Forensic Science Evidence in Question', Criminal Law Review, pp. 347 56 / Graham Jackson pt. III INTERPRETING FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE 12.`A Framework for Analysis', in Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36 56 / Erica Beecher-Monas Contents note continued: 13.`The Vision in "Blind" Justice: Expert Perception, Judgment, and Visual Cognition in Forensic Pattern Recognition', Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, pp. 161 7 / Simon A. Cole 14.`Forensic Identification: From a Faith-based "Science" to a Scientific Science', Forensic Science International, 201, pp. 14 17 / Michael J. Saks 15.`Interpretation of Statistical Evidence in Criminal Trials: The Prosecutor's Fallacy and the Defense Attorney's Fallacy', Law and Human Behavior, 11, pp. 167 87 / Edward L. Schumann 16.`Presenting Probabilities in Court: The DNA Experience', International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 1, pp. 187 214 / Mike Redmayne 17.`Communicating Opinion Evidence in the Forensic Identification Sciences: Accuracy and Impact', Hastings Law Journal, 59, pp. 1159 89 / Michael J. Saks 18.`She Blinded Me with Science: Wrongful Convictions and the "Reverse CSI-Effect"', Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 17, pp. 481 98 / Marie Alou Contents note continued: pt. IV PROCEDURAL REFORM IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE 19.`The Psychiatric Expert in Court', Psychological Medicine, 14, pp. 291 302 / Anthony Kenny 20.`Expertise and the Daubert Decision', Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, pp. 1157 75 / Ronald J. Allen 21.`Eyes Wide Shut: Hidden Problems and Future Consequences of the Fact-Based Validity Standard', Seton Hall Law Review, 34, pp. 89 103 / Joelle Anne Moreno 22.`Daubert, Schmaubert: Criminal Defendants and the Short End of the Science Stick', Tulsa Law Review, 43, pp. 597 607 / Susan D. Rozelle 23.`The Law Commission's Report on Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings', Criminal Law Review, pp. 844 62 / Andrew Roberts 24.`Expert Evidence and the Law Commission: Implementation without Legislation?', Criminal Law Review, pp. 561 76 / Tony Ward Contents note continued: 25.`Court Experts and Expert Witnesses: Have We a Lesson to Learn from the French?' Current Legal Problems, 45, pp. 213 36 / J.R. Spencer 26.`Forensic Science in Inquisitorial Systems of Criminal Justice', Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 7, pp. 36 43 / Bron McKillop.

List(s) this item appears in: Law of Evidence Books, SLSN | SLS, NOIDA LIBRARY, NEW ARRIVAL BOOKS JUNE 2017

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Call number	Copy number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Books	Symbiosis Law School, Noida REFERENCE CUPBOARD	Reference	345.42067 ROB.E (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Not For Loan		SLSN-B-11003

Browsing Symbiosis Law School, Noida shelves, Shelving location: REFERENCE CUPBOARD, Collection: Reference Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	345.41 EAD Arlidge, Eady and Smith on Contempt	345.410234 Arlidge, Eady and Smith on Contempt	345.4202 COL.C Collins on defamation /	345.42067 ROB.E Expert evidence and scientific proof in criminal trials	345.73 GAR.F Federal habeas corpus :	345.7305 WEA.C Criminal procedure :	346.022 SOY.O Offshore contracts and liabilities /	Next

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Contents

Machine generated contents note: pt. I INTERDISCIPLINARY `FORENSIC SCIENCE'
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
1.`Historical and Practical Considerations Regarding Expert Testimony', Harvard Law Review, 15, pp. 40
58 / Learned Hand
2.`A Just Measure of Science', in Michael Freeman and Helen Reece (eds), Science in Court, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 11
36 / David Nelken
3.`Science and Technology Studies on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise', Social Studies of Science, 35, pp. 269
311 / Simon Cole
4.`Of Truth, in Science and in Law', Brooklyn Law Review, 73, pp. 985
1008 / Susan Haack
5.`The Irrelevance, and Central Relevance, of the Boundary between Science and Non-Science in the Evaluation of Expert Witness Reliability', Villanova Law Review, 52, pp. 679
722 / D. Michael Risinger
pt. II EXPERT EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
6.`Fingerprint Evidence in an Age of DNA Profiling', Brooklyn Law Review, 67, pp. 14
71 / Jennifer L. Mnookin
Contents note continued: 7.`Science in the Criminal Process', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14, pp. 469
506 / Paul Roberts
8.`"Junk Science": The Criminal Cases', Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, pp. 105
28 / Paul C. Giannelli
9.`Sounding Out Expert Voice Identification', Criminal Law Review, pp. 771
90 / David Ormerod
10.`Atkins v The Emperor. The "Cautious" Use of Unreliable "Expert" Opinion', International Journal of Evidence & Proof 14, pp. 146
66 / Mehera San Roque
11.`Forensic Science Evidence in Question', Criminal Law Review, pp. 347
56 / Graham Jackson
pt. III INTERPRETING FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE
12.`A Framework for Analysis', in Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36
56 / Erica Beecher-Monas
Contents note continued: 13.`The Vision in "Blind" Justice: Expert Perception, Judgment, and Visual Cognition in Forensic Pattern Recognition', Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, pp. 161
7 / Simon A. Cole
14.`Forensic Identification: From a Faith-based "Science" to a Scientific Science', Forensic Science International, 201, pp. 14
17 / Michael J. Saks
15.`Interpretation of Statistical Evidence in Criminal Trials: The Prosecutor's Fallacy and the Defense Attorney's Fallacy', Law and Human Behavior, 11, pp. 167
87 / Edward L. Schumann
16.`Presenting Probabilities in Court: The DNA Experience', International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 1, pp. 187
214 / Mike Redmayne
17.`Communicating Opinion Evidence in the Forensic Identification Sciences: Accuracy and Impact', Hastings Law Journal, 59, pp. 1159
89 / Michael J. Saks
18.`She Blinded Me with Science: Wrongful Convictions and the "Reverse CSI-Effect"', Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 17, pp. 481
98 / Marie Alou
Contents note continued: pt. IV PROCEDURAL REFORM IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
19.`The Psychiatric Expert in Court', Psychological Medicine, 14, pp. 291
302 / Anthony Kenny
20.`Expertise and the Daubert Decision', Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, pp. 1157
75 / Ronald J. Allen
21.`Eyes Wide Shut: Hidden Problems and Future Consequences of the Fact-Based Validity Standard', Seton Hall Law Review, 34, pp. 89
103 / Joelle Anne Moreno
22.`Daubert, Schmaubert: Criminal Defendants and the Short End of the Science Stick', Tulsa Law Review, 43, pp. 597
607 / Susan D. Rozelle
23.`The Law Commission's Report on Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings', Criminal Law Review, pp. 844
62 / Andrew Roberts
24.`Expert Evidence and the Law Commission: Implementation without Legislation?', Criminal Law Review, pp. 561
76 / Tony Ward
Contents note continued: 25.`Court Experts and Expert Witnesses: Have We a Lesson to Learn from the French?' Current Legal Problems, 45, pp. 213
36 / J.R. Spencer
26.`Forensic Science in Inquisitorial Systems of Criminal Justice', Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 7, pp. 36
43 / Bron McKillop.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.