Criminological theory : assessing philosophical assumptions Anthony Walsh, Boise State University.
Material type:
- 9781455777648
- 364.01 WAL.C
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Symbiosis Law School, Noida | 364.01 WAL.C (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | SLSN-B-10941 |
Browsing Symbiosis Law School, Noida shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
364.01 HOD.O Origins of Criminological Theory | 364.01 MEL.T Travels of the criminal question : | 364.01 NAT.C Criminal justice theory : | 364.01 WAL.C Criminological theory : | 364.011 GER.A Agent-Based Modelling for Criminological Theory Testing and Development | 364.014 COY.T Talking criminal justice : | 364.019 KAR.E Emotions, crime and justice |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 181-203) and index.
Criminologists can benefit from questioning the underlying assumptions upon which they rest their work. Philosophy has the ability to clarify our thoughts, inform us of why we think about things the way we do, solve contradictions in our thinking we never knew existed, and even dissolve some dichotomies we thought were cast in stone. One of those dichotomies is free will vs. determinism. Criminology must reckon with both free will and agency, as posited by some theories, and determinism, as posited by others-including the ever more influential fields of genetics and biosocial criminology. This title examines philosophical concepts such as these in the context of important criminological theories or issues that are foundational but not generally considered in the literature on this topic.
There are no comments on this title.