Just satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights / Octavian Ichim.
Material type:
- 9781107072367
- 342.24085269 ICH.J
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Symbiosis Law School, Noida REFERENCE CUPBOARD | Reference | 342.24085269 ICH.J (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not For Loan | SLSN-B-8640 |
Browsing Symbiosis Law School, Noida shelves, Shelving location: REFERENCE CUPBOARD, Collection: Reference Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
342.088 LAN.C Complicity and its limits in the law of international responsibility / | 342.11241029 OLI.C Constitution of independence : | 342.240850261 GRA.E European Convention on Human Rights : | 342.24085269 ICH.J Just satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights / | 342.37029 BRO.C Cicero and modern law / | 342.4 HES.C Constitutional policy and change in Europe | 342.40873 MAK.E Equal in Law, Unequal in Fact : |
Revision of author's thesis (doctoral - Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland), 2012 --Verso of title page.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 351-364) and index.
Machine generated contents note: 1. Introduction; 2. Methods and principles of legal analysis; 3. Conditions for the application of Article 41; 4. Types of damage: understanding the Court's logic in determining the necessity of an award and in quantifying it in monetary terms; 5. Procedure and execution; 6. What future for just satisfaction?; 7. Conclusions; Annexes.
"How effective is the European Court of Human Rights in dispensing justice? With over 17,000 judgments handed down, it is undoubtedly the most prolific international court but is it the most efficient when compensating the victims of a violation? This crucial but often overlooked question is the focus of this important new monograph which gives a clear, comprehensive and convincing demonstration of the negative impact, in terms of unpredictability and legal uncertainty, of the discretion used by the Court when it comes to the regime of reparation. It reveals the adverse influence of such a high discretion on the quality of its rulings - ultimately on the coherence of the system and on the Court's authority, and makes suggestions for improvement"--
There are no comments on this title.