Law-making process / (Record no. 582761)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 07733cam a2200289 i 4500 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 150529s2015 enk b 001 0 eng |
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER | |
International Standard Book Number | 9781849465625 |
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER | |
Classification number | 349.42 |
Cutter | ZAN.L |
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | Zander, Michael, |
245 14 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | Law-making process / |
Statement of responsibility, etc | Michael Zander. |
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT | |
Edition statement | Seventh edition. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) | |
Place of publication, distribution, etc | Oxford : |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc | Hart Publishing, |
Date of publication, distribution, etc | 2015. |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION | |
Extent | xxxiv, 476 pages ; |
Dimensions | 25 cm. |
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE | |
Bibliography, etc | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Legislation |
Geographic subdivision | Great Britain. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Law |
Geographic subdivision | Great Britain |
General subdivision | Interpretation and construction. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Stare decisis |
Geographic subdivision | Great Britain. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Judicial process |
Geographic subdivision | Great Britain. |
650 #0 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Law reform |
Geographic subdivision | Great Britain. |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
Item type | Books |
505 0# - | |
-- | 1.Legislation: The Whitehall Stage<br/>1.1.The Preparation of Legislation<br/>1.1.1.The Sources of Legislation<br/>1.1.2.The Role of the Civil Servants<br/>- The Bill Team<br/>1.1.3.Consultation<br/>1.1.4.Cabinet Control<br/>1.2.Drafting Legislation<br/>1.2.1.The Office of Parliamentary Counsel<br/>1.2.2.The Process of Drafting<br/>1.3.Criticism of the Quality of Drafting<br/>1.4.What to do about the Quality of the Statute Book?<br/>1.4.1.Plain Language Drafting<br/>1.4.2.The Tax Law Rewrite<br/>1.5.The `Good Law' Initiative<br/>1.6.Final Approval Before Introduction in Parliament<br/>2.Legislation: The Westminster Stage<br/>2.1.The Legislative Process<br/>2.1.1.Procedure for Public Bills<br/>2.1.2.Royal Assent<br/>2.1.3.Queen's or Prince's Consent<br/>2.1.4.Private Bill Procedure<br/>2.1.5.Hybrid Bills<br/>2.1.6.Private Members' Bills<br/>2.1.7.Consolidation and Statute Law Revision or Repeal<br/>2.1.8.Special Procedure for Uncontroversial Law Commission Bills<br/>Contents note continued: 2.1.9.Special Procedure for the Tax Law Rewrite<br/>2.2.Legislative Committees<br/>2.2.1.Public Bill Committees (formerly called Standing Committees)<br/>2.2.2.First Reading Committees<br/>2.2.3.Second Reading Committees (House of Commons)<br/>2.2.4.Grand Committees (both Houses)<br/>2.2.5.Select Committees on Bills<br/>2.2.6.The Role of Departmental Select Committees in Legislation<br/>2.2.7.Public Bill Committees<br/>-the Case for Reform<br/>2.3.The Role of the Bill Team<br/>2.4.Interaction Between Interested Parties During the Legislative Process<br/>2.5.The Time Taken by Parliamentary Debates<br/>2.6.The Impact on Bills of the Parliamentary Process<br/>2.6.1.How Often does the Opposition Oppose a Bill?<br/>2.6.2.Who Moves and What Happens to Amendments?<br/>2.7.The Composition of the House of Lords<br/>2.8.Publication of Bills in Draft Form<br/>2.9.Carrying-Over Legislation from One Session to Another<br/>2.10.Control of the Length or Debates<br/>Contents note continued: 2.11.The Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949<br/>2.12.Legislation in Haste<br/>2.13.When does a Statute Come into Force?<br/>2.14.Statutes Online<br/>2.15.The Reach of Legislation and Devolution<br/>2.15.1.Scotland<br/>2.15.2.Wales<br/>2.15.3.Northern Ireland<br/>2.16.Delegated Legislation<br/>2.16.1.Forms of Statutory Instruments (SIs)<br/>2.16.2.Procedures for Creating Statutory Instruments<br/>2.16.3.Preparation of SIs<br/>2.17.Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation<br/>2.17.1.Parliamentary Committees<br/>2.17.2.Remedial Orders under the Human Rights Act 1998<br/>2.17.3.Legislation for Northern Ireland<br/>2.17.4.Judicial Scrutiny of Statutory Instruments<br/>2.17.5.Delegated Legislation<br/>- Anglo-American Comparison<br/>2.18.Making Better Law<br/>3.Statutory Interpretation<br/>3.1.Interpretation is a Necessary Aspect of Communication<br/>3.2.The Three Basic So-called `Rules' of Statutory Interpretation<br/>3.2.1.The Literal Rule<br/>3.2.2.The Golden Rule<br/>Contents note continued: 3.2.3.The Mischief Rule<br/>3.3.The Three Basic Rules Considered<br/>3.3.1.The Dominant Rule was the Literal Rule<br/>3.3.2.What of the Golden Rule?<br/>3.3.3.Is the Mischief Rule any Better?<br/>3.4.Understanding the Context: Statutes and Judicial Decisions<br/>3.4.1.The Court Can Read the Whole Statute<br/>3.4.2.The Court Can Read Earlier Statutes<br/>3.5.Understanding the Context: Evidence Beyond Statutes and Judicial Decisions<br/>3.5.1.International Conventions or Treaties<br/>3.5.2.General Historical Background<br/>3.5.3.Government Publications<br/>3.5.4.Parliamentary Debates<br/>3.5.5.Pepper V Hart<br/>3.5.6.Pepper V Hart Considered<br/>3.5.7.Explanatory Notes<br/>3.6.Presumptions and Subordinate Principles of Interpretation as an Aid to Construction<br/>3.7.Are the Rules, Principles, Presumptions and Other Guides to Interpretation Binding on the Courts?<br/>3.8.Interpreting Bills of Rights<br/>Contents note continued: 3.8.1.The Human Rights Act 1998: A New Rule of Statutory Interpretation<br/>3.9.What (if any) is the Function of General Statutory Rules on Statutory Interpretation?<br/>3.10.Do Statements of General Principle Assist?<br/>3.11.What is the Court's Proper Function in Interpreting a Statute?<br/>3.11.1.To Seek Out the Intention or Purpose of Parliament?<br/>3.11.2.To Give Effect to What Parliament said, Rather than What it Meant to Say?<br/>3.11.3.Should Interpretation Reflect Changing Times?<br/>3.11.4.Has Membership of the European Union Changed the Principles of Statutory Interpretation?<br/>3.11.5.Is Statutory Interpretation a form of Legislation?<br/>4.Binding Precedent: The Doctrine of Stare Decisis<br/>4.1.The Hierarchy of Courts and the Doctrine of Binding Precedent<br/>4.1.1.The House of Lords and Supreme Court<br/>4.1.2.The Court of Appeal, Civil Division<br/>4.1.3.The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division<br/>4.1.4.Divisional Courts<br/>4.1.5.Trial Courts<br/>Contents note continued: 5.4.The Values Promoted by the System of Precedent<br/>5.5.Flexibility and Stability in the Common Law System<br/>6.Law Reporting<br/>6.1.The History of Law Reporting<br/>6.2.Criticisms of the System<br/>6.3.The Advent of Online Access to Law Reports<br/>6.4.What Decisions are Reported?<br/>6.5.Too Many Unreported Decisions<br/>6.6.Restricting the Citation of Authorities<br/>6.7.The Hierarchy of Law Reports<br/>6.8.The Form of Law Reports<br/>7.The Nature of the Judicial Role in Law-Making<br/>7.1.The Personal Element in Judicial Law-Making<br/>7.2.The Background of Judges<br/>7.3.The Appointment of Judges<br/>7.3.1.The Lord Chancellor Replaced by a Judicial Appointments Commission<br/>7.3.2.Diversity on the Bench<br/>7.3.3.A New Way of Selecting the Senior Judiciary?<br/>7.4.Do Judges have Biases?<br/>7.5.Should Judges be Activist?<br/>7.6.Can Judges Undertake their Own Researches into the Law?<br/>7.7.What the Law is and What it Ought to be<br/>Contents note continued: 7.8.The Practical Effect of the Retrospective Impact of Common Law Decisions<br/>7.9.Prospective Overruling as an Aid to Creative Law-Making<br/>7.10.Legal Arguments by Non-Parties<br/>7.11.Interaction between the Judge and the Advocate<br/>7.11.1.The Quality of Oral Argument in the Court of Appeal<br/>7.12.The Trend Towards Written Argument<br/>7.13.Interaction Between the Judges and their Judicial Assistants<br/>7.14.The Interaction Between the Judges<br/>7.15.The Role of the Supreme Court<br/>8.Other Sources of Law<br/>8.1.European Union Law<br/>8.1.1.The Institutions of the European Union<br/>8.1.2.EU Law and the United Kingdom System<br/>8.1.3.Parliamentary Scrutiny of European Legislation<br/>8.2.Scholarly Writings<br/>8.3.Custom<br/>8.4.Quasi-legislation, Codes of Practice, Circulars, etc<br/>9.The Process of Law Reform<br/>9.1.The History<br/>9.2.The English and Scottish Law Commissions<br/>9.2.1.The White Paper<br/>9.2.2.The Law Commissions Act 1965<br/>Contents note continued: 9.2.3.The Commission's Method of Working<br/>9.2.4.High Repute but Funding Problems<br/>9.3.The Law Commission<br/>-Modern Developments<br/>9.3.1.The 2010 Protocol<br/>9.4.Judicial Law-Making in the Light of the Existence of the Law Commission<br/>9.5.The Law Commission and the Codification Project<br/>9.6.The Law Commission and Consultation. |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Date acquired | Source of acquisition | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Koha item type | Cost, normal purchase price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Symbiosis Law School, Nagpur | Symbiosis Law School, Nagpur | 12/03/2020 | Mehul | 340.1 MIC | SLSNG-B-2778 | 02/06/2020 | Books | 4060.43 | |||||
Dewey Decimal Classification | Symbiosis Law School, Noida | Symbiosis Law School, Noida | 06/01/2017 | Mohan Law House, New Delhi | 349.42 ZAN.L | SLSN-B-10356 | 10/01/2017 | Books |