000 | 02047cam a22003138i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 18645288 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20171216130029.0 | ||
008 | 150605s2015 nyu 000 0 eng | ||
010 | _a 2015021265 | ||
020 | _a9781107120945 (hardback) | ||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda |
||
042 | _apcc | ||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aHB99.5 _b.K39 2015 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a330 _223 |
084 |
_aPOL011000 _2bisacsh |
||
100 | 1 | _aKaya, Ayse. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPower and global economic institutions / _cAyse Kaya, Swarthmore College. |
263 | _a1510 | ||
300 | _apages cm | ||
520 | _a"This book contends that existing approaches leave out key aspects of the relationship between economic power and formal political power in multilateral economic institutions.Importantly,while existing works focus on either power or institutions as distinct realms,we must examine their intersection as well. Third,institutions mediate the importance of the inter-state distribution of economic power through institutional rules and conventions.Simply,institutional conventions denote well-established procedures and specific interpretations of rules for certain actions.Among the many conventions a single institution may embody,of interest here are those that concern formal political power,including the procedures for altering it.Reasonably,these existing rules and conventions determine the parameters,if not the content,of how members alter formal political power in the institution.Particularly,such rules may more often than not be a source for "incremental change" as opposed to more big-bang alterations (e.g.,Pierson 2004; Thelen and Mahoney 2010). Given that the literature currently lacks an integrative theory"-- | ||
650 | 0 | _aInstitutional economics. | |
650 | 0 | _aPower (Social sciences) | |
650 | 0 | _aInternational relations. | |
650 | 7 |
_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE / International Relations / General. _2bisacsh |
|
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cB |
||
999 |
_c595775 _d595775 |