000			02699nam a22002057a 4500
003			OSt
005			20160913114135.0
008			160908b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9781849460880
040			_cSLSN
082			_a342 _bFIS.R
100			_aFisher, Elizabeth
245			_aRisk regulation and administrative constitutionalism
260			_aOxford: _bOxford University Press, _c2010.
300			_axxxii, 290. p, ;
500			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [259]-282) and index.
505			_aCover Acknowledgements Contents Table of Abbreviations Table of Cases Table of Legislation Introduction 1. Risk Evaluation through the Lens ofAdministrative Constitutionalism I. The Science/​Democracy Dichotomy in Regulating Technological Risk II. Technological Risk, Public Administration, and Administrative Constitutionalism III. Two Paradigms of Administrative Constitutionalism in the Risk Regulation Context IV. Administrative Constitutionalism as a Form of Legal Culture V. An Example: The Precautionary Principle and Administrative Constitutionalism VI. Conclusion Part One. Administrative Constitutionalism in National Legal Cultures Introduction to Administrative Constitutionalism in National Legal Cultures I. Nature of Administrative Constitutionalism II. The Role of Law III. The Relationship Between Legal Concepts and the Regulatory Regimes for Technological Risk Evaluation IV. Conclusion 2. BSE, Expertise, and Administrative Constitutionalism: Examining the Role of the Southwood Working Party I. Thinking of BSE in Terms of Administrative Constitutionalism II. Technological Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism in the UK: A Brief History III. The Administrative Constitutionalism Context of the BSE Crisis IV. The Southwood Working Party V. After Southwood VI. Conclusions 3. Hard Looks and Substantial Evidence: Scope of Review of US Risk Regulation Rule-making in the 1970s I. Scope of Review and Administrative Constitutionalismin Historical Perspective II. Administrative Constitutionalism and Risk Regulation Regimes in the Early 1970s III. Hard Look Review IV. Substantial Evidence and the Occupational Safety and Health Act V. Scope of Review under the RI Paradigm VI. Reflections VII. Conclusion 4. The Precautionary Principle and Merits Review in Australia I.
520			_aThe regulation of environmental and public health risks is a controversial area of government activity. This book studies the public law dimension of these controversies, particularly the interrelationship between risk regulation, public law and theories of legitimate administrative governance.
942			_2ddc _cB
999			_c577013 _d577013