TY  - BOOK
AU  - Roberts,Paul
TI  - Expert evidence and scientific proof in criminal trials 
T2  - The international library of essays on criminal law
SN  - 9781409466062
U1  - 345.42067 
PY  - 2014///
CY  - England
PB  - Ashgate Publishing Limited
KW  - Evidence, Expert
KW  - Criminal procedure
KW  - Criminal justice, Administration of
N1  - Includes bibliographical references and index
N2  - Contents

        Machine generated contents note: pt. I INTERDISCIPLINARY `FORENSIC SCIENCE'
        THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
        1.`Historical and Practical Considerations Regarding Expert Testimony', Harvard Law Review, 15, pp. 40
        58 /​ Learned Hand
        2.`A Just Measure of Science', in Michael Freeman and Helen Reece (eds), Science in Court, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 11
        36 /​ David Nelken
        3.`Science and Technology Studies on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise', Social Studies of Science, 35, pp. 269
        311 /​ Simon Cole
        4.`Of Truth, in Science and in Law', Brooklyn Law Review, 73, pp. 985
        1008 /​ Susan Haack
        5.`The Irrelevance, and Central Relevance, of the Boundary between Science and Non-Science in the Evaluation of Expert Witness Reliability', Villanova Law Review, 52, pp. 679
        722 /​ D. Michael Risinger
        pt. II EXPERT EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
        6.`Fingerprint Evidence in an Age of DNA Profiling', Brooklyn Law Review, 67, pp. 14
        71 /​ Jennifer L. Mnookin
        Contents note continued: 7.`Science in the Criminal Process', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14, pp. 469
        506 /​ Paul Roberts
        8.`"Junk Science": The Criminal Cases', Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, pp. 105
        28 /​ Paul C. Giannelli
        9.`Sounding Out Expert Voice Identification', Criminal Law Review, pp. 771
        90 /​ David Ormerod
        10.`Atkins v The Emperor. The "Cautious" Use of Unreliable "Expert" Opinion', International Journal of Evidence &​ Proof 14, pp. 146
        66 /​ Mehera San Roque
        11.`Forensic Science Evidence in Question', Criminal Law Review, pp. 347
        56 /​ Graham Jackson
        pt. III INTERPRETING FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE
        12.`A Framework for Analysis', in Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual Due Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36
        56 /​ Erica Beecher-Monas
        Contents note continued: 13.`The Vision in "Blind" Justice: Expert Perception, Judgment, and Visual Cognition in Forensic Pattern Recognition', Psychonomic Bulletin &​ Review, 17, pp. 161
        7 /​ Simon A. Cole
        14.`Forensic Identification: From a Faith-based "Science" to a Scientific Science', Forensic Science International, 201, pp. 14
        17 /​ Michael J. Saks
        15.`Interpretation of Statistical Evidence in Criminal Trials: The Prosecutor's Fallacy and the Defense Attorney's Fallacy', Law and Human Behavior, 11, pp. 167
        87 /​ Edward L. Schumann
        16.`Presenting Probabilities in Court: The DNA Experience', International Journal of Evidence &​ Proof, 1, pp. 187
        214 /​ Mike Redmayne
        17.`Communicating Opinion Evidence in the Forensic Identification Sciences: Accuracy and Impact', Hastings Law Journal, 59, pp. 1159
        89 /​ Michael J. Saks
        18.`She Blinded Me with Science: Wrongful Convictions and the "Reverse CSI-Effect"', Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 17, pp. 481
        98 /​ Marie Alou
        Contents note continued: pt. IV PROCEDURAL REFORM IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
        19.`The Psychiatric Expert in Court', Psychological Medicine, 14, pp. 291
        302 /​ Anthony Kenny
        20.`Expertise and the Daubert Decision', Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 84, pp. 1157
        75 /​ Ronald J. Allen
        21.`Eyes Wide Shut: Hidden Problems and Future Consequences of the Fact-Based Validity Standard', Seton Hall Law Review, 34, pp. 89
        103 /​ Joelle Anne Moreno
        22.`Daubert, Schmaubert: Criminal Defendants and the Short End of the Science Stick', Tulsa Law Review, 43, pp. 597
        607 /​ Susan D. Rozelle
        23.`The Law Commission's Report on Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings', Criminal Law Review, pp. 844
        62 /​ Andrew Roberts
        24.`Expert Evidence and the Law Commission: Implementation without Legislation?', Criminal Law Review, pp. 561
        76 /​ Tony Ward
        Contents note continued: 25.`Court Experts and Expert Witnesses: Have We a Lesson to Learn from the French?' Current Legal Problems, 45, pp. 213
        36 /​ J.R. Spencer
        26.`Forensic Science in Inquisitorial Systems of Criminal Justice', Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 7, pp. 36
        43 /​ Bron McKillop.


UR  - http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy16pdf02/2014941561.html
ER  -